Home | News | Senate Judiciary Vote Thursday for Five Fringe Obama Judges

Senate Judiciary Vote Thursday for Five Fringe Obama Judges

By
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote today on five of President Obama’s leftwing fringe judicial nominees -- candidates that have once been returned to the President as unacceptable.

Each of these controversial nominees was passed out of committee but are so controversial that President Obama and Democrat leaders have avoided discussing them in public.

Before breaking for the August recess, Republicans returned these five nominees to the President as unacceptable.  It requires unanimous consent to keep a nominee on the executive calendar when the Senate enters a recess period of 30 days or more.

As part of that fundamental change to America that Obama’s hoping for, he’s re-nominated all five.  These controversial judges would have lifetime appointments to work their hope and change magic that would alter the notion that judges should be impartial and decide cases based on the law and the facts.

The rundown from the Senate Judiciary Republican media shop:

Robert Chatigny (Second Circuit)

As a federal district court judge in Connecticut, Chatigny did everything in his power to prevent the execution of confessed serial killer and rapist Michael Ross (the “Roadside Strangler”). Chatigny even claimed that Ross’ “sexual sadism” was a “mitigating factor” that made him less culpable for his crimes. Chatigny also has never given more than the minimum sentence in every child porn case over which he has presided, and found Megan’s Law to be unconstitutional (overruled unanimously by the U.S. Supreme Court).

    * Serial killer Michael Ross was convicted of the kidnap, rape, and murder of six Connecticut women ages 15 to 25. After granting two stays of execution, which were both reversed by appellate courts, Chatigny bullied Ross’ lawyer into filing for an additional stay despite the fact that, after almost 20 years on death row, the murderer didn’t want to appeal anymore. Chatigny asserted that the murderer suffered from death row syndrome, was not competent to waive further appeals, called him “the least culpable person on death row,” and argued that he “never should have been convicted” because his sexual sadism was a mitigating factor.

   * After the case concluded, prosecutors discovered that Judge Chatigny previously had been involved in the case as a private attorney, but failed to disclose it. His actions resulted in seven state prosecutors filing an ethics complaint against him and a Connecticut congressman calling for his impeachment.

    * Chatigny also has a long record of “downward departures” where has given a lighter sentence than the minimum recommended by the federal Sentencing Guidelines. For example, in the 12 child pornography cases he handled as a judge, he issued a sentence less than the minimum eight times and issued the minimum under the guidelines the other four times. He never once issued more than the minimum sentence in a child porn case.

    * He also struck down part of Connecticut’s Megan’s Law, requiring the registration of sex offenders, only to be reversed by a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court.

Goodwin Liu (Ninth Circuit)

A Berkeley professor with no experience as a judge or practicing attorney, Liu believes that government healthcare and welfare are constitutional rights, and that foreign law should be used in American courts.

    * He has written that “expanded health insurance, child care, transportation subsidies, job training, and a robust earned income tax credit” are positive Constitutional rights.

    * He believes that it is acceptable for American judges to use foreign law in interpreting our Constitution, saying that “the United States can hardly claim to have a monopoly on wise solutions to common legal problems faced by constitutional democracies around the world.”

    * He does not believe judges are bound to apply the Constitution according to its written meaning, but rather are free to “adapt” the Constitution “in light of changing needs, conditions, and understandings of our society.”

    * He believes the Constitution is a “living document,” is “indeterminate,” and subject to “socially situated modes of reasoning that appeal… to… culturally and historically contingent meanings.”

 Edward Chen (Northern District of California)

A former staff attorney for the ACLU, Chen has been involved in many controversial causes and has made numerous inappropriate statements while sitting as federal magistrate judge. For instance, Chen said he did not feel patriotic pride when hearing “America the Beautiful,” but rather “ambivalence and cynicism.”

    * For 16 years, Chen worked as a Staff Attorney for the ACLU. During this time, he made several controversial statements and took positions in litigation that raise questions regarding whether he will faithfully and impartially apply the law. For example, he strongly opposed English-only and anti-affirmative action proposals and opposed injunctions against gang-related activity in residential neighborhoods and private-sector drug testing.

    * During a speech to the liberal American Constitution Society, Chen said that he finds “most rewarding… [c]ontributing to the development of the law via published opinion, especially if it comports with [his] view of justice.”

    * He echoed President Obama’s infamous empathy standard and argued that “judges have to make determinations that draw not so much upon legal acumen, but on an understanding of people and of human experiences.”

    * Speaking about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, he said that he “had a sickening feeling in [his] stomach about what might happen to race relations and religious tolerance on our own soil… [O]ne has to wonder whether the seemingly irresistible forces of racism, nativism and scapegoating which has recurred so often in our history can be effectively restrained.”

    * He characterized as “institutionalized racism” the “federalization of state crimes” and the “[c]riminalization of immigration laws,” and he suggested that the slow response to Hurricane Katrina was due to racism.

Louis Butler (Western District of Wisconsin)

Louis Butler is such a judicial activist that Wisconsin voters twice rejected his candidacy for a seat on the state’s supreme court, yet President Obama insists on ignoring their expressed will and imposing Butler on the people of Wisconsin by nominating and now re-nominating him to the federal district court.

    * While on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Butler was notoriously activist, repeatedly disregarding the policy decisions of the legislature and binding precedent, and instead inserting his own policy preferences.

    * In one case, he held that a manufacturer could be held liable for injuries from a product that, as the dissent explained it, the manufacturer “may or may not have produced, which may or may not have caused the plaintiff’s injuries, based on conduct that may have occurred over 100 years ago when some of the defendants were not even part of the relevant market.”

    * In another case, Butler somehow interpreted a voter-approved constitutional amendment clearly written to expand gun-carrying rights as instead limiting gun-carrying rights.

    * As a practitioner, he earned—and publicly embraced—the nickname “Loophole Louie,” for winning reversals of his clients’ criminal convictions.

Jack McConnell (District of Rhode Island)

Jack McConnell is a personal injury attorney who has demonstrated hostility against business and whose pattern of making large campaign donations to State Attorneys General who grant him lucrative contingency-fee contracts raises troubling ethical questions.

    * McConnell is a pioneer of the controversial practice of private attorneys representing State Attorneys General on contingency-fee contracts. At the same time, he has taken the unseemly step of contributing substantial amounts of money to the political campaigns of the very Attorneys General awarding them, raising serious questions of pay-to-play.

    * After McConnell’s questionable theory of liability against lead paint manufacturers was unanimously rejected by the Rhode Island Supreme Court, he publicly attacked the decision as letting “wrongdoers off the hook,” revealing a preference for outcome-driven judicial decisions.

    * The United States Chamber of Commerce, which historically has never taken a position on a nominee to the District Court, has publicly opposed this nomination, citing McConnell’s “actions during his career as a personal injury lawyer and past statements [that] demonstrate his disregard for the rule of law, an activist judicial philosophy and obvious bias against businesses.”


Connie Hair writes daily as HUMAN EVENTS' Congressional correspondent. She is a former speechwriter for Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) and a former media and coalitions advisor to the Senate Republican Conference. You can follow Connie on Twitter @ConnieHair.

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (21 posted)

avatar
richard pannier 09/27/2010 18:52:28
* Speaking about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, he said that he “had a sickening feeling in [his] stomach about what might happen to race relations and religious tolerance on our own soil… [O]ne has to wonder whether the seemingly irresistible forces of racism, nativism and scapegoating which has recurred so often in our history can be effectively restrained.”

And you're upset be cause he has been correct?
There has been an almost unabated Arab bashing going on. One only need turn on the radio for ten minutes to hear some hysterical ramblings from some "American" claiming that Arabs have to be watched. Prevented from being in the military.
I would also point to this almost forgotten incident:
radio personality Jerry Klein. Jerry Klein started on a hate-filled, Muslim bashing rant just after Thanksgiving where, among other things, he said that Muslims should have to wear ‘crescent-shaped tattoo’ or an armband to identify them as Muslim.
The first caller basically told him he was crazy. But, the second caller and many more after that called to agree with his anti-Muslim statements. Some even chided the talk show host for not going far enough.
It turns out that Mr. Klein staged his rant to see what the reaction would be. To say the least, he was extremely disturbed (as anyone should) by the number of people who called to agree with him – or to say we need to go further.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-3
Report as inappropriate
avatar
Elizabeth Ferrari 09/27/2010 18:58:22
Are we talking about the same Barack Obama? Left wing (it's two words, by the way) fringe, President Barack Obama? The same Obama that kept Bush's Pentagon, that Barack Obama?

Left wing?! Barack Obama wouldn't appoint a left wing "fringe" candidate if he was on fire.

Are you people for real or is this satire?
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-4
Report as inappropriate
avatar
<a href="http://www.vendingworld.com">VendingWorld</a> 06/10/2012 17:52:03
See any difference(especially for Viet Nam Vets)?People are finally starting to actually care about vets.How many Iraq/Afghanistan vets are you familiar with?I know a boatload,as I volunteer with them or their families about 20 hours/week.
avatar
Craig Stevens 09/27/2010 19:14:21
The deranged idiots at DemocratUnderground.com have been notified of this article and are being encouraged to post comments: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9211533
Prepare to be amazed by their brilliant political insights.
avatar
molly millions 10/01/2010 13:46:10
Yeah all because some ex prescription drug hooked lady who had brain surgery tells the DU idiots to do it ....
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
22
Report as inappropriate
avatar
DUmp Spy CU-5150 10/01/2010 11:58:45
Beware the DUmmies who aren't what they appear to be just to advance their left wing agenda. THEY WILL SAY ANYTHING!!!!!!
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
18
Report as inappropriate
avatar
Deranged Idiot 09/27/2010 19:29:30
Apparently Craig Stevens thinks anyone who disagrees with him is a deranged idiot.

These appointees are hardly "fringe". We should be so lucky as to get real leftists on the bench.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-15
Report as inappropriate
avatar
Craig Stevens 09/27/2010 19:32:37
Actually I think a majority of the posters at DemocraticUnderground.com qualify as deranged idiots. I could point you to any number of posts there to support my position.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
15
Report as inappropriate
avatar
Karl Schneider 10/01/2010 09:01:06
It is my sad duty to inform you that you are crazier than a shithouse rat.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-18
Report as inappropriate
avatar
TominTib 10/01/2010 14:16:01
Hey KKKarl,

Here's a great site for you to view some past comments from your friends in the "reality based community": http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/board,40.0.html
You idiots are well known as one of the biggest groups of douche bags on the internet.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
12
Report as inappropriate
avatar
Craig 10/01/2010 13:54:31
Exactly the response I'd expect from the DUmp, thanks!
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
15
Report as inappropriate
avatar
09/27/2010 23:03:39
w8liftinglady,

Why don't you expand your horizons and do your own research? DU is a cesspool populated by the most hate-filled, unhappy people on the Internet. By relying on the group-think at DU to help you formulate your "Editorials" you just end up looking like a fool. It would also help if you spent a couple seconds proofreading your garbled nonsense for spelling/punctuation errors.

Sincerely,
Craig
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
22
Report as inappropriate
avatar
molly millions 10/01/2010 14:01:58
Thats Ok Craig most of her posts gets about 9 comments of which 3 or 4 are her rec&kicks,she does have a patriotic heart for the military,but as you know DU hates the military...
All the problems in the world are caused by either Bush or the Military industrial complex according to the kids at DU...
Somebody described DU once as like a bunch of 5 yr old girls playing soccer full of enthusiasm but not a clue how to play the game..:>)
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
24
Report as inappropriate
avatar
w8liftinglady 09/28/2010 07:40:38
Craig Stevens (if that's who you are)
I'll be glad to list my ltte...please tell me where I am wrong.
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/w8liftinglady/94
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/w8liftinglady/92
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/w8liftinglady/83
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/w8liftinglady/81
I hope your experiences as a military veteran were acceptable.If they weren't,please let me know,as I volunteer with several organizations that can help.
how do you see these appointments as being unacceptable?Instead of insulting me,tell me how you receive information and resources.

Bless you.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-12
Report as inappropriate
avatar
09/28/2010 16:34:27
w8liftinglady (if that is who you are),

I certainly do not mean to insult you, in rereading my above posts I see that I have done that and I apologize. My disagreement with you stems from your involvement with DU, a website that allows the most vile, anti-military hate speech to be found on the internet. Any attempt to provide an opposing opinion at DU is met with an IP ban. DU is an example of an echo-chamber, where only certain opinions are tolerated and all others are forbidden, much like Free Republic on the right.
My experience as a disabled Marine has been very positive. The VA has been very helpful and I really don't feel that there has been anything lacking in my care and treatment. I also volunteer my time at the local VA Hospital, I commend you for doing the same.

Craig
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
19
Report as inappropriate
avatar
w8liftinglady 09/29/2010 15:50:23
Craig..
I'm glad the VA is working for you.Today,there was an announcement that more presumptives have been added to diseases of Gulf war,Iraq and afghanistan vets.people don't hear about these things...nor do they care.they want to wave flags and play war with other folks' kids.Compare the VA advancements since 2008 versus those from 2001-2008.See any difference(especially for Viet Nam Vets)?People are finally starting to actually care about vets.How many Iraq/Afghanistan vets are you familiar with?I know a boatload,as I volunteer with them or their families about 20 hours/week.

Maybe you should become a fly on the wall on DU.My friend "unhappycamper" and I are veteran advocates there.google unhappycamper's posts on DU-and then compare them to the veteran posts on "conservative" websites.We can talk later.I respect anyone's right to speak their mind in America.We must be sure we are accurate in our responses.I will continue,as always,to work tirelessly for veterans and their families.
Bless you.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-4
Report as inappropriate
avatar
10/01/2010 16:18:27
If you define cutting and pasting mostly negative articles, and making short pointless statements as "veteran advocacy", then I guess your buddy UnhappyCamper has it nailed. And based on your comments in the new thread you started and continue to self-kick, you don't respect anyones opinion unless it's one of your fellow DUmpmonkies stroking your ego.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
17
Report as inappropriate
avatar
Proteus Lives 10/01/2010 17:19:16
Have you noticed when she posts her articles in the proper forum (Veterans) it never gets any replies...
Yes unhappycamper hates the military while telling everyone he served in Vietnam (i am 6.0 tall blond and look like Angela Jolie;>)...)
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
13
Report as inappropriate
avatar
w8liftinglady 09/29/2010 16:37:01
and,while you're at it,if you have any veterans websites you can refer me to,I'd appreciate it.
i already subscribe to VA Watchdog,Veterans Today,Veterans for Common Sense,IAVA,Gulfweb.org,and GulfWarVets.com
avatar
molly millions 10/01/2010 13:47:17
Are you back on the drugs?
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
14
Report as inappropriate
avatar
Craig 10/01/2010 12:57:03
[link]http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9234700#9236449[/link]
Stay classy, Beth. I hope that one gets you a lot of recs back at the ant farm.
total: 8 | displaying: 1 - 8

Post your comment

  • Bold
  • Italic
  • Underline
  • Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha

Log in

  • Email to a friend Email to a friend
  • Print version Print version
  • Plain text Plain text

Tagged as:

No tags for this article

Rate this article

3.71
Powered by Vivvo CMS v4.5.2