Peace among enemies
The "season of good will entered the trenches" were words that I read describing what some call the "Christmas Truce of 1914."
Others refer to the event as a "shining episode of sanity from among the bloody chapters of World War I."
While the details of this event has often been embellished in hindsight, there is one conclusion that is never denied — the fact that Christmas managed to bring so-called mortal enemies together as friends for a time.
Some say the soldiers exchanged cigarettes and cake. Some say they joined in song and in a game of soccer.
Whatever, it is indisputable that at least some of the men who were lined up in trenches along the Western Front — sometimes no more than 30 yards away from each other — on the first Christmas of the first World War, ceased fire and had the courage to meet one another face to face in no-man’s land.
The beauty of this moment was that it was spontaneous, unplanned, not orchestrated or scripted.
With no interference by generals and politicians, the lower ranks — whose life expectancy during World War I was maybe two weeks — figured out how to create peace.
No, the peace did not last. Generals on both sides eventually ordered that the fighting continue. And there would not be another Christmas truce in the next four years of war.
I came upon this information only recently and I don’t recall ever learning it when I studied history in school.
Most history books I’ve looked in since, only give the incident a fleeting mention as if it was pretty much inconsequential.
But the more I ponder it, the more hope-filled I become.
I’m reminded of an email forward titled "Polar Bear: I come in peace" that made the rounds months ago.
It was a collection of photographs featuring a polar bear’s approach to a team of tethered sled dogs in the wilds of Canada’s Hudson Bay.
It was noted by Stuart Brown that the photographer, Norbert Rosing, was sure he was soon to see the demise of his dogs. But that didn’t happen.
The photos he took, to our point of view, might conclude that the bear and dogs played together.
And it was said that the bear returned many nights to "play" with the dogs.
Some dispute the interpretation of "play" and say rather the animals were just being curious of each other. Regardless, nobody died during the exchange — the point that captured my attention at the time.
And again, it seemed that peace was possible — dare I say natural — among supposed enemies.
I can’t help but think that among the disciples of Jesus were also some unlikely friends — fishermen, political activists and a tax collector who might never have become friends if not for Jesus.
Jesus often associated with and helped those that some among him would have defined as their "enemy."
And I can’t help but remember when Jesus was captured in the Garden of Gethsemane when a disciple cut off the ear of one of the arresting soldiers.
Jesus stopped his disciples from fighting and healed the soldier’s ear. (Luke 22:51)
Jesus had much to say about those we perceive as our enemies including, "Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you, bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you." (Luke 6:27-28)
Oh I know we live in difficult times these days when such instructions may seem impossible or crazy. We don’t often know who to trust. And there are those who are so consumed by their fears, hatred and misconceptions, that all they can think about is killing their enemies. How can peace be possible with such people? How could we ever be friends with people who want to kill us?
Almost 10 million died during World War I and millions more were wounded. I suspect among those killed were many of the same ones who found a way to create peace on Christmas in 1914. If only they could tell us how they did it. Apparently both sides wanted peace that Christmas — if only for a day.
I suppose wanting peace is a good beginning.
For me, the Christmas Truce of 1914 showed that living in peace is the most natural action for humankind. Peace is our God-given nature that Jesus aptly illustrated for us during his lifetime. And if peace is more natural than war, then peace among all enemies is possible.
Surely if peace is possible for some — if possible in the midst of battle — then peace under any circumstances and at any future point in time can be a reality. We can live in the manner God intends for His creation. The thought of this peaceful possibility gives me hope.
Annette Bridges is a freelance writer who lives on a north Texas ranch with her husband, John. Her columns are published weekly on United Press International’s ReligionAndSpirituality.com, Examiner.com and numerous other websites and newspapers. Visit her website and participate in her blog at www.annettebridges.com and send her an email at firstname.lastname@example.org.